Specifications and Limits: The New Plan of Clam Hut marina would need to be within the area of the previous marina. The marina would have to either stay within the restraints of the previous permits or require new permits to be able to update the structure to the new FEMA codes. The plan must also be in correspondence to the owner’s budget and personal plan. The owner also needs to be able to afford to run the marina after construction is finished. The dock needs to be designed to maximize this space to hold the same or possibly more boat slips and tables on the deck and to withstand the maximum wave force possible to prevent the establishment from being destroyed by another storm. The marina needs to be as eco-friendly and selfsufficient as possible.
November 15, 2013
Background Information: The Clam Hut is a restaurant, bar and marina located in Highlands, NJ. The Clam Hut survived as a successful business and favorite spot for locals for many years. One of the Clam Hut’s biggest attractions is the deck where the bar is located which hangs over the water and is adjacent to the marina. However, in October 2012, Super-storm Sandy tore apart the foundation holding up the deck of the bar and the marina. The owners of the restraint and marina are thinking of ways to restore their business but the cost of the project and the overall devastation in Highlands has slowed progress.
November 5, 2013
Dining Deck
alternate solutions
Triangular
Bamboo
The Bamboo design uses the strong properties of bamboo and the concrete fortification of the traditional design. The planks would be very skinny or curved so the planks would have to be replaced or treated.
Traditional
Floating
The Floating Dock design is modular so the risk of the entire marina being is very slim and the floating docks that aren’t destroyed could be reused or repaired. The floating docks would be composed of a calcium carbonate cement and rubber barrels with a steel frame. The design is semi Eco-friendly using rubber barrels and calcium carbonate cement with a steel frame.
Rationale and Alternate Solution Comparsion Chart
Rationale
The Triangular design was very sturdy
because of the use of triangular beams. The design was as eco-friendly as the
traditional design by using regular timber. Even though the triangular design
uses about twice as many beams as the regular design they are about half the
size because of their shape. However the
design was very complex and called for a double layer of substructures instead
of just one layer.
The Traditional design
was sturdy and reliable because it is what is used in most marinas today. The
design is cost effective because the design is the control to what everything
else is based off of. The design is semi eco-friendly because it uses plastic
composite planks. The design however could not stand up to the storm the last
time so the traditional design is not very reliable.
The Bamboo design is very
sturdy because of the strong properties of bamboo and the concrete
fortification of the traditional design. Bamboo is fairly cost and eco-friendly
because of the plants rapid growth rate and abundance. The planks however would
be very skinny or curved and there is a possibility they would rot when exposed
to the salt water so the planks would have to be replaced or treated.
The Floating Dock design
is not meant to be sturdy but fluctuate with the tides the upside of this
design is if a storm is to hit the marina the marina now becomes modular so the
risk of the entire marina being is very slim and the floating docks that aren’t
destroyed could be reused or repaired. The floating docks are already put into
place at most launch ramps so the design is already known to be reliable. The
design is semi Eco-friendly using rubber barrels and calcium carbonate cement
with a steel frame.
The Floating Dock design
had the highest score in the design matrix however because of the scoring in
the design matrix I decided to alter the design to be made of planks instead of
the calcium carbonate cement material.
Triangular
|
Bamboo
|
Floating
|
Traditional
|
|
Eco-friendly
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
Cost effective
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
Simply constructed
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Able to withstand storms
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
Reliable
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Total
|
6
|
15
|
16
|
13
|
October 11, 2013
Weekly Log
October 4 to October 10:
Work Completed:
Friday October 4: Contacted Mike Danko about developmental work and a possible meeting.
Sunday October 5: Went to different marinas in Highlands to look at structures and renovations
Tuesday October 8: Consulted with group members about group site plans and drawings.
Thursday October 10: Contacted Highlands Municipal Center for site and building plans. Contacted Mr. Paul Vitale, the building officer of Highlands, regarding site plans and developmental work
Work to be Completed:
I need to finish the drawing of my site plan and work on my developmental work and keep in contact with Mr. Paul Vitale.
Issues to be Solved:
Getting the actual site plans from the Highlands Municipal Department
Communication with Mentor:
Contacted Mike Danko and Paul Vitale
Areas where help is still needed:
I need to review my new designs with Mr. Danko and Mr. Vitale to make sure they are feasible and viable.
October 4, 2013
Weekly Log
September 27 to October 3:
Work Completed:
Friday September 27: I finished my testing procedures and watched
the video of my initial progress update and started my presentation reflection.
Saturday September 28: I finished my presentation reflection
and researched the Belmar Municipal Marina.
Tuesday October 1: I edited my design brief and specs and
limits.
Thursday October 3: I started the drawing of the site plan.
Work to be Completed:
I need to finish the drawing of my site plan and work on my developmental work contact mentor.
Issues to be Solved:
Further researching Belmar Municipal Marina to see the issues a floating dock marina faced.
Communication with Mentor:
I had no contact with my mentor this week.
Areas where help is still needed:
I need to review my new designs with my mentor to make sure they are feasible and viable.
September 27, 2013
Weekly Log
September 20 to September26:
Monday September 23: I finished the model and rationale report.
We held a team meeting with the teachers about the direction of the project
based on the models. The group realized we need to collaborate more on how
everything is going to work together.
Thursday September 26: I presented my initial progress
update and started the presentation evaluation. During my presentation some of my visuals failed to upload so I am finding out why that happened. My teachers brought some points
to my attention regarding testing and my designs that I plan on researching
further.
September 26, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)